By black Marxist intellectual, Frantz Fanon’s
The book is the Bible of Anti-colonialism in Africa
![]() |
Download this MUST read book HERE
![]() |
| Black Marxist intellectual, Frantz Fanon |
When you see how it drips with hatred for whites, how they look at us, what they think of us, then you will understand the futility of trying to appease them by building schools, hospitals or houses for them like White South Africans did during Apartheid.
SOME PEOPLE WILL NEVER LEARN THE LESSONS OF HISTORY
BECAUSE THE JEWISH PROFESSORS AT THE ELITE UNIVERSITIES
ARE TOO BUSY RE-WRITING IT.
REVISIONIST HISTORY IS THE RULE
OF THE DAY AT MOST COLLEGES
Then you understand the futility of trying to be a liberal idiot that Fanon called “whites with dual citizenship” . . . they want to support blacks, but at the same time remain white and living in white areas, driving white cars and dressing in white clothes.
In the mind of these blacks all whites have benefited from Colonialism/Apartheid and all are therefore guilty of oppressing blacks.
When the slaughter comes there will be no discrimination between liberal or conservative whites.
Your skin will be your uniform and to them having a white skin is wearing the uniform of the enemy.
Fanon hides nothing: in order to fight against us the former colony must fight against itself: or, rather, the two struggles form part of a whole.
In the heat of battle, all internal barriers break down the puppet bourgeoisie of businessmen and shopkeepers, the urban proletariat, which is always in a privileged position, the lumpen proletariat of the shanty towns — all fall into line with the stand made by the rural masses, that veritable reservoir of a national revolutionary army; for in those countries where colonialism has deliberately held up development, the peasantry, when it rises, quickly stands out as the revolutionary class.
East LA is just a taste of the demolishing of all existing structures the rest will be LAW and ORDER
the nigger knows only destruction . . .
look around you – see where they live
In order to triumph, the national revolution must be socialist; if its career is cut short, if the native bourgeoisie takes over power, the new state, in spite of its formal sovereignty, remains in the hands of the imperialists.
![]() |
| Germain Katanga |
Thus the unity of the Third World is not yet achieved.
The apocalyptic” chess game between the superpowers,
that is, between those that move on the highest plane
of our civilisation, is being played according to the rule:
“if either ‘wins’ it is the end of both.”
Moreover the game bears no resemblance to whatever
war games preceded it.
Its “rational” goal is mutual deterrence,
not victory.
[Hannah Arend - A Special Supplement: Reflections on Violence]
This is what Fanon explains to his brothers in Africa, Asia, and Latin America: we must achieve revolutionary socialism all together everywhere, or else one by one we will be defeated by our former masters.
He hides nothing, neither weaknesses, nor discords, nor mystification.
Here, the movement gets off to a bad start; there, after a striking initial success it loses momentum; elsewhere it has come to a standstill, and if it is to start again, the peasants must throw their bourgeoisie overboard.
The reader is sternly put on his guard against the most dangerous will o' the wisps: the cult of the leader and of personalities, Western culture, and what is equally to be feared, the withdrawal into the twilight of past African culture.
For the only true culture is that of the revolution; that is to say, it is constantly in the making.
Fanon speaks out loud; we Europeans can hear him, as the fact that you hold this book in your hand proves; is he not then afraid that the colonial powers may take advantage of his sincerity?
No; he fears nothing.
Our methods are out-of-date; they can sometimes delay emancipation, but not stop it.
The Legacy of Neocolonialism -
The Last Stage of Imperialism
Machiavellianism (or machiavellian mask) is,
according to the Oxford English Dictionary,
"the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft
or in general conduct", deriving from the Italian Renaissance diplomat and writer Niccolò Machiavelli,
who wrote Il Principe (The Prince) and other works.
The word has a similar use in modern psychology where it describes one of the dark triad personalities,
characterised by a duplicitous interpersonal style
associated with cynical beliefs and pragmatic morality. "Machiavellian" (and variants) as a word became
very popular in the late 16th century in English,
though "Machiavellianism" itself is first cited by
the Oxford English Dictionary from 1626
Our Machiavellianism ** has little purchase on this wide-awake world that has run our falsehoods to earth one after the other.
** Machiavellianism (the political doctrine of Machiavelli: any means (however unscrupulous) can be used by a ruler in order to create and maintain his autocratic government)
The settler has only recourse of one thing: brute force, when he can command it; the native has only one choice, between servitude or supremacy.
What does Fanon care whether you read his work or not?
It is to his brothers that he denounces our old tricks, and he is sure we have no more up our sleeves.
It is to them he says: "Europe has laid her hands on our continents, and we must slash at her fingers till she lets go.
It's a good moment; nothing can happen at Bizerta, at Elizabethville or in the Algerian bled ** that the whole world does not hear about.
The rival blocs take opposite sides, and hold each other in check; let us take
advantage of this paralysis, let us burst into history, forcing
**Up-country in North Africa.—Trans. it by our invasion into universality for the first time.
Uhuru the night of the long knives
Europeans, you must open this book and enter into it.
After a few steps in the darkness you will see strangers gathered around a fire; come close, and listen, for they are talking of the destiny they will mete out to your trading centres and to the hired soldiers who defend them.
They will see you, perhaps, but they will go on talking among themselves, without even lowering their voices.
This indifference strikes home: their fathers, shadowy creatures, your creatures, were but dead souls; you it was who allowed them glimpses of light, to you only did they dare speak, and you did not bother to reply to such zombies.
Their sons ignore you; a fire warms them and sheds light around them, and you have not lit it.
Now, at a respectful distance, it is you who will feel furtive, night bound, and perished with cold.
Turn and turn about; in these shadows from whence a new dawn will break, it is you who are the zombies.
In this case, you will say, let’s throw away this book.
Why read it if it is not written for us?
For two reasons: the first is that Fanon explains you to his brothers and shows them the mechanism by which we are estranged from ourselves; take advantage of this, and get to know yourselves seen in the light of truth, objectively.
Our victims know us by their scars and by their chains, and it is
this that makes their evidence irrefutable.
It is enough that they show us what we have made of them for us to realize what we have made of ourselves. [HA. . . NOT SO, the kike jews were and still is behind the slave-trade - then and now - read up on this]
But is it any use?
Yes, for Europe is at death's door.
But, you will say, we live in the mother country, and we disapprove of her excesses.
It is true, you are not settlers, but you are no better.
For the pioneers belonged to you; you sent them overseas, and it was you they enriched
You warned them that if they shed too much blood you would disown them, or say you did, in something of the same way as any state maintains abroad a mob of agitators, agents provocateurs, and spies whom it disowns when they are caught.
You, who are so liberal and so humane, who have such an exaggerated adoration of culture that it verges on affectation, you pretend to forget that you own colonies and that in them men are massacred in your name.
Fanon reveals to his comrades — above all to some of them who are rather too Westernized — the solidarity of the people of the mother country and of their representatives in the colonies.
Karl Heinrich Marx was born in 1818 to
Jewish parents in Trier,
Prussia, now modern-day Germany
You see, I, too, am incapable of ridding myself of subjective illusions; I, too, say to you: "All is lost, unless ... " As a European, I steal the enemy's book, and out of it I fashion a remedy for Europe.
Make the most of it.
And here is the second reason: if you set aside Sorel's fascist utterances, you will find that Fanon is the first since Engels to bring the processes of history into the clear light of day.
Moreover, you need not think that hotheadedness or an unhappy childhood has given him some uncommon taste for violence; he acts as the interpreter of the situation, that's all.
Hat Tip to http://the-atrocities-perpetrated-against-th.blogspot.com/search/label/THE%20WRETCHED%20OF%20THE%20EARTH

















